Nobel Peace Prize. An honor. To receive it, definitely. But to be nominated for it? Maybe, maybe not. Read on:
Let’s face it, the world has many people that want to plug their own political agenda, and Shay Cullen is no different. It was he who stated to reporters in February 2000 that he would receive the Nobel Peace Prize in the year 2000. He did not receive the award, but claimed in May that he had been nominated. Then he was nominated for the prize in the years 2001 and 2003, and it is my belief that those nominations were campaigned for by Shay Cullen through his supporters and his organization for political, glory and monetary gain, not for his real worthiness.
Just because someone is nominated for the prize does not mean that they are indeed worthy to receive it. Just think: Stanley “Tookie” Williams, put to death on December 13, 2005 for the brutal murderer that he was, and the event was reported by most major news media live as it happened, was not worthy of the prize. He was nominated by his supporters in the hopes that his death conviction would be rescinded on the basis of some children’s books that he wrote in collaboration with others. He apparently also wrote one or two short books of his own that according to the web site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Williams did not sell well, and may have been donated to schools, children’s centers and the like.
Shay Cullen, likewise, is certainly not the epitome of love and truth. Certainly, it is obvious from the documents that he signed that he is not truthful about those who oppose him. Consider his very words in sworn affidavits and on his web site where he calls a simple German styled restaurant (Gasthous) a sleazy bar!
It is not surprising to me that he gets so many millions in donations – donations that may or may not be used for their intended purposes - most people only know of his side of the story, and he does tell a good story. Unfortunately, his story is sometimes very far from the truth, such as his claims that Hartmut "Dirty Harry" Joost is a leader of a "sex mafia" or the leader of some "pedophile support ring."
What bothers Shay Cullen and his backers is that Mr. Joost is a person that actually helps falsely accused persons; persons that Shay Cullen want to have in jail whether they are guilty or not, and Mr. Joost has uncovered many of Shay Cullen's frame ups.
Consider the mansion that he has for the “rehabilitation” of abused women and children: It is located directly across the street from people living in squalor. Does he help his neighbors? I see no evidence of such assistance, but I do see him illegally building additions to his property with no posted building permits; I do see records of complaints of an illegally built septic tank that spilled into the neighboring cemetery; I do see records of complaints for his disrupting funerals in a most un-Christian manner.
I also present to the reader the fact that Preda did not start out to helping wormen and children; it was a drug rehabilitation facility that was a dismal failure until Shay Cullen and his supporters crossed the lines by bringing in sexually abused women and children to be treated along with drug addicts. At this time there are no drug addicts being treated to my knowledge, and that aspect of the facility is moot, but the point of the matter is, WERE SEXUALLY ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN PLACED AT RISK BY SHAY CULLEN?
Consider this: When Shay Cullen was accused of raping my daughter, I wrote to the then Secretary of the Department of Social Welfare and Development requesting that the license for Preda to be suspended for the duration of the investigation. IT WAS NOT THEN AND HAS NEVER BEEN SUSPENDED DESPITE LAWSUITS SUCH AS LIBEL, GRAVE ORAL DEFAMATION, VIOLATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE CHILD PROTECTION LAW (Republic Act 7610) AND RAPE BEING FILED IN COURT. Except for the charge of libel and rape, the other charges are being heard in court YET THE LICENSE FOR PREDA HAS NOT TO THIS DAY BEEN SUSPENDED NOR TERMINATED.
Does Mr. Cullen deserve a Nobel prize? Look at the documents on this site that have so many times denounced this man. Look also at the outright falsehoods he has told to the world. Then ask yourself if such a man is worthy of such a noble achievement award. Is he even worthy to be called a man of God?