Here is my picture.  Some people have said that I look like Shay Cullen.  I do not believe so, but that is only my opinion.  I do know that I do not think like him, because I believe in telling the truth; he apparently does not based upon his many documented outright falsehoods.

Shay Cullen and his staff claim that I had an illicit affair with a 16 year-old girl, the daughter of my house girl.  Note that the age of the girl was first reported as 14, then 12 and finally 16.  It seems to me strange that he has a fetish for the value of 2, if the reader cares to follow the many instances where ages of the victims/perpetrators and the number of instances involved in his reports are varied from the truth.

For example, he interviews my adopted son and the house girl’s son, and he knows full well that both boys are twelve (12) years old at the time.  Doesn’t it seem odd to the reader that the age of the house girl’s son was reported as fourteen (14) and my adopted son’s age was reported by him as ten (10)?

Another point is that he has the house girl’s boy sign two documents, one of which says he admits to two (2) instances of rape of my daughter, yet when the case is filed before the prosecutor, he claims that the boy admitted to four instances of rape.

First of all, the boy, being merely twelve years old, being told that he will get help if he admits to two instances of rape versus the ten that he was accused of (see the police blotters of 17 October 1997 and 29 January 1998) and then being presented with two documents that he claims to his parents that he was not permitted to read (or even if he simply just did not take the time to read, being that he was only a boy), would not the implication be that he was thinking that he was signing for each instance of rape as he claims?

Now consider the following:

 

1.     The boy accuses me of having an affair with his sister.

2.     The accusation is not filed to court by the prosecutor.

3.     The boy signed such a claim after only one interview with Preda which was done on 3 March 1998, according to Shay Cullen’s transcript, with the documents already prepared for signing.  Note the date of the signature of the complaint signed before the prosecutor is the same date as the interview with the boy.

4.     The house girl’s daughter, when she was of legal age, went to another prosecutor without either her parents nor myself and swore out a statement that I had never treated her inappropriately.

 

and here’s the real kicker:

 

5.     My daughter is in Preda from 29 January until 26 February 1998, and under government supervision from 26 February until 20 May 1998, yet there is not one accusation of such an event from her.  She should have been the one to make such a statement were it true during the time that she was confined in Preda without my being able to visit her, wouldn’t she?  After all, there was more than enough time to prepare her to make such an accusation.

       If there were PROOF of my misdeeds, why didn't Shay Cullen and his staff file rape charges against me in early 1998?  Even the DSWD interviewed separately the daughter of the maid, and THEY did nothing!  The first charge filed against me was not for rape, but for Obstruction of Justice, and that wasn't filed until November 16, or nearly 10 months after supposed knowledge of rape on my part!  Is obstruction of justice somehow more important than rape?

 

Look at the charges they DID file:  Obstruction of justice (twice, the second one dismissed for forum shopping); libel on the internet (twice, and at the time I did not have any internet connection, plus one of the co-respondents was in jail and another not even in this country!); Deportation (twice, the last complaint still pending although the complaints are totally rediculous - not paying taxes in another country, defrauding the health care of another country, speculation as to my fleeing this country, and charged for 'malicious prosecution' because I complained that a prosecutor who inhibited himself 4 times elected to petition to put my daughter in involuntary custody, despite a court order that she be returned to her family).

Doesn’t that sound in the least bit strange to the reader?  Does it not appear to be a frame up that is at the very least incomplete, incongruous, and not in the best of intentions?  Does that show tactful use of donations to help abused women and children?

Does it not also seem odd that Shay Cullen and Preda have such a hatred for me that they libel me consistently even though I fight back?  More than that, they do not even give me credit for what I do, but attribute my actions to others.

For example, when I filed grave oral defamation charges against Shay Cullen, and it was filed in court in July 1998, Shay Cullen went to court, signed for the charges and placed on his web site that the SBMA Chairman Richard Gordon had filed charges against him on 9 July 1998.  Well, didn’t actually SAY that it was filed by Richard Gordon, but it was placed into his writing in such a way as to IMPLY that it was filed by him by the statement, “This is evidence of harassment and the intimidation of the people threatening them if they dare to criticize the ruling dynasty.”  Cute, huh?

By the time I had filed 23 complaints for libel, perjury, slander, rape, obstruction of justice, etc. against Shay Cullen and his cohorts, he gave credit to some fictitious “Olongapo City Sex Mafia” and accused me to be a member thereof for filing 25 complaints (one complaint was filed by the Mayor f Davao City for libel, and the other complaint was filed by four former wards of Preda claiming they were stiffed of promised money, so now you see who the "Olongapo Sex Mafia" really is).  When I and my wife filed deportation charges against Shay Cullen on 19 July 2004, no reply nor counter affidavit was ever received, yet in January 2005, he had the gall to put on his web page that “local politicians” had filed for his deportation.

So now I am no longer a member of the sex mafia but a local politician?  I don't think so!  By the way, that complaint is still outstanding since 2004.  Imagine that!

Since 1998, Shay Cullen and his Preda organization have continually attacked my good name, and efforts to find justice have been stymied.  One would think that unwarranted attacks that result in loss of credibility would result in at least a backing off of such attacks, but Shay Cullen and Preda apparently will not cease and desist, continue relentlessly to attack without doing any more than making a name for themselves as needing more contributions in their fight against the "sex mafias and pedophile protection groups" that are attacking them.

Now, interestingly, I have looked through my records, and although accused publicly on the Internet, in newspapers, magazines and in verbal statements, I cannot find any filing of any case directly accusing me of having and illicit affair, rape of a minor, or other such charge.  What has been filed against me are the following:

 

1.                   1998-2230 & 2231, Obstruction of Justice and violation or R.A. 7610.  In this complaint (dismissed), there was a mention in passing that I had an illicit affair, but was not expounded upon.  The full weight of the case was that I did not file charges against the boys and that by keeping my daughter at home exposed her to further rape by her half-brother.  This was, as far as I could see, merely an attempt to break up a brother and sister from their family.  Not very Christian.

2.                   1999-125, Libel.  In this case (dismissed), there is no comment that I can find that links me to any sex act with a minor.  Oddly enough, I was only given a single page complaint that ended “CONTRARY TO LAW” and signed by all signatures of the complete complaint. (signed complaint) (signed page)

3.                   2000-195, Libel.  However, in this case (dismissed), it seems that my name was only mentioned as a respondent; not that I did anything at illegal.  Again, an almost perfect repeat performance of 1999-125 in the underhanded delivery of the complaint to the respondents, only this time is was only Shay Cullen that signed the one page complaint that ended “CONTRARY TO LAW” (signed complaint) (signed page)

4.                   2002-1050 & 1051, Libel and slander.  In this complaint (dismissed), there is a direct reference to the accusation of me sleeping with a 16 year old, but that is not part of the actual complaint.  WHY?

5.            DEPORTATION:  First complaint filed against me was complained of being an overstaying alien, I believe.  I state "I believe" due to the dismissal of charges against me stated that all my papers were in order, but I have never to this day received any complaint, although the dismissal was dated February 6, 2001.

6.             SECOND DEPORTATION:  This was filed by Shay Cullen and seven (7) employees (one of whom seems to be a foreigner).  If the sworn complaint is true and there are 86 employees of Preda (paragraph 24 of the complaint), why was there not 87 signatures on the complaint for my deportation?  Moreover, as this complaint was signed in May of 2008, and evidence brought forth that I am not guilty of the accusations for which were placed, why is the decision of the Commissioner of Immigration still pending?  The accusations, by the way are 1) I don't pay U.S. income tax (not a concern of the Philippine government); 2) I defraud the U.S. health care system (not a concern of the philippine government); and 3) I plan to flee the Philippines (speculation only).  In none of the complained items above was there even an offer of PROOF, yet the decision to dismiss or deport is still unresolved.  Why?  Payoffs by Preda or Preda supporters, possibly?  Certainly not by ME.  One thing is certain, though,  Either way, Shay Cullen and the staff who filed this case are in deep trouble now.  I will demand restitution and damages for this false attack on my good name!  But I suspect that the ultimate offense will be that I somehow DIE in custody.  What a way to get rid of your opposition!

 

Doesn’t that sound in the least bit strange to the reader?  Does it not appear to be a frame up that is at the very least incomplete, incongruous, and not in the best of intentions?

Where does the libel and unwarranted attacks end?  Why is it that he cannot be brought to justice in this country?  Why is it that he cannot be deported?  Why is it that an organization that dabbles in atomic energy when they were set up to help drug addiction cannot be closed down?  Why can I not get restitution for the damage that has been done to my family?

Please see the links to verify the statements made, as those links go directly to the documents concerned.  If the reader finds errors here (see CONTACT ME), and I will work to resolve them.